It’s nothing personal. We’re good at living short and brutal lives. Indeed we’ve even codified an approach to life that ameliorates the shortness and brutalness: ‘Eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die’, ‘A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush’, ‘Make hay while the sun shines’.
Today, lives are not short and brutal. We do not roam the lush plains of the Omo River near the Kenya-Ethiopia boarder in groups of twenty just trying to stay alive, like we did 195,000 years ago. “We are not setting rigging on Navy ships at the age of fourteen”We are not setting rigging on Navy ships at the age of fourteen without good food or good care, like the sailors of the 1700’s. And we do not deal with infant mortality rates that would see almost every family suffer the loss of a child (at least), like the city dwellers of the 1800’s. But we got pretty good at dealing with it: loss was ever present, so learned to go for the known safe option; loss was ever present, so we learned to discount the future heavily because we may never get there.
However, the unsuitability today of tactics derived yesterday is a cause for celebration rather than a commiseration; it is the effect of living longer, healthier lives.
So how long? How different? How much change in life expectancy has there really been? Bring on the facts.
“Life expectancy has been increasing by about 2.5 years per decade, that’s three months per year, six hours per day.”
And this has been happening in England since 1850 – the dawn of industrialisation. “Life expectancy . . . increasing . . . six hours per day”So, anytime in the last 162 years, a child born a week after another would have a life expectancy nearly two days longer. I’m aware that 162 years might seem like a long time, but we’ve been ‘training’ for shortness and brutalness for [rightcol]
195,000 years. Those that are of retirement age today are pretty-much the grandchildren of Victorians – the architects of this great leap forward in life expectancy. Evolutionarily speaking 162 years is only the blink (of a blink, of a blink), of an eye.
“…most babies born since 2000 in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, the USA, Canada, Japan, and other countries with long life expectancies will celebrate their 100th birthdays”
This is extraordinary, no? And the authors are confident the ageing process is modifiable to the point where we will live long without severe disability.
We have a phenomenally speedy increase in life expectancy coupled with quality of life.
“Of all the people in the world who have ever lived to be 65, two-thirds are alive today.”
It’s no wonder we’re no good at saving for pensions, huh?
For more on pensions: Shlomo Benartzi: Saving for tomorrow, tomorrow | Video on TED.com
For more on this speak with us, or have a look at our capabilities
Also, as co-founders and supporters of the London Behavioural Economics Network, join the Meetup group and Facebook group for more details and events
Related Posts
August 13, 2023
Money (but not called that, and how it changes behaviour).
Advertising agencies make a lot of…
August 1, 2023
Reading ease is not as easy as all that – comprehension shows the way
It's easy to make text readable, right?…
July 20, 2023
The ‘Hollywood hello’ – and the importance of context when communicating
When communicating we all like to be as…